Oxycontin:
America's Hidden Drug Epidemic By Evan Kanarakis
Perhaps
one of the most devastating drug epidemics gripping America
in recent years has been abuse of the prescription drug
Oxycontin, manufactured by the Conneticut'based company
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P ('Purdue Pharma').
Derived
from opium, and containing the active ingredient of
what is known as 'oxycodone', Oxycontin was, and indeed
still is, hailed as something of a 'miracle drug' for
those whom it was originally intended for, that being
primarily terminal cancer patients and chronic pain
sufferers. Taken as a tablet, the drug is designed for
slow release over a twelve'hour period, so that a patient
is only required to take two doses a day, offering relief
and a high similar to morphine. Given the strength of
the medication, however, a full 100% of all users become
physically dependent, and it has been estimated in some
quarters that addiction rates to the drug run as high
as 30%.
Controversially,
many argue that Purdue Pharma over'marketed the product
upon its release in 1995. When over'prescription of
the drug by doctors combined with word of Oxycontin's
powerful effects, demand on the streets began to grow
at a rapid pace. So as to avoid the controlled'release
mechanism of the pill, chewing, crushing, snorting or,
dissolving in water and then injecting the drug was
found to offer a concentrated high comparable to top
grade heroin but with the FDA approved reliability of
coming in a pure, same'size dose every time. Legal,
covered by most health insurance plans, with patients
of both legitimate and phoney claims receiving prescriptions
for the pill, and many packets of the drug stolen from
medical practices and family medicine cabinets alike,
a drug problem soon emerged across social and economic
classes in America unlike anything that had been seen
before. From rural areas to the suburbs, offices to
high schools, Oxycontin had taken grip. Indeed, regardless
of whatever mark'up dealers put on the drug at the street
level, in 2002 7 million prescriptions had been written
for Oxycontin, generating sales for Purdue of a truly
staggering $1.5 billion.
And
so it is that today in many parts of the country Oxycontin
has become 'the new Valium' for homemakers in suburbia,
and there's been a proliferation of so'called 'pill
parties' among teenagers where participants meet to
try a variety of prescription drugs including Oxycontin.
Naturally, taking the medication in combination with
other drugs and alcohol (also known as 'polypharmacy')
and broken down into a concentrated form is incredibly
dangerous, and perhaps far more dangerous than these
unsuspecting teenagers might realise. One 80mg dose
of Oxycontin, for instance, is the equivalent of taking
16 pills of the well'known painkiller Percocet (also
a target for drug abusers). Given this kind of potency,
overdose from Oxycontin can occur easily. Though it
can take many forms, the most common result is a state
of respiratory depression leading to potential complete
respiratory failure. To date, while the official figures
vary widely, several hundred deaths related to Oxycontin
use have been confirmed, although some circles argue
that the true extent of overdoses is impossible to calculate
because so many deaths, particularly among those from
the white middle'class sector of users have been spared
'official victim' status so as to remove the potential
stigma of being labelled an Oxycontin abuser.
Indeed,
that the drug has afflicted such a socio'economic class
is one of the main reasons that it is an epidemic so
often unheard of outside certain circles and in the
mainstream media. Perhaps the most significant scandal
involving Oxycontin to hit the headlines was the 2003
discovery that right'wing talk'show host Rush Limbaugh
was addicted to Oxycontin and may well have acquired
the drug on the illegal black market. This was after
Limbaugh had angrily asserted on a number of occasions
on his nationally'syndicated radio'show that drug users
deserved harsh prison penalties over expensive treatment
programmes. In 1995 he declared:
'There's
nothing good about drug use... Drug use destroys societies...
And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs,
using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good
because we know what happens to people in societies
and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And
so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they
ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and
they ought to be sent up.'
He
concluded by adding:
'What
this says to me is that too many whites are getting
away with drug use... The answer is to go out and find
the ones who are getting away with it, convict them
and send them up the river (to prison) too.'
Hypocritically,
Limbaugh was of course not, as per his own harsh assessment
of the drug use problem in America, convicted, and still
hosts his radio show despite the fact it was alleged
his housekeeper acted as his drug buyer for years prior
to his addiction becoming public.
And
yet it is arguably this kind of soft'treatment of Oxycontin
that has allowed the issue to linger relatively unabated
for years. Responding to pressure and a number of lawsuits,
Purdue Pharma embarked upon a public service announcement
campaign in 2003 saying that 4 million Americans were
abusing or misusing prescription drugs each month, and
also reported that it was working toward developing
a so'called 'smart pill' which loses its painkilling
properties if crushed and snorted, however such technology
is years away, and at present, with those billions of
dollars of profit at stake, Oxycontin is still available
to be prescribed, stolen, dealt and misused by Purdue
Pharma regardless.
On
the other side of the debate, of course, are the thousands
of very real victims of terminal cancer and chronic
pain who look to Oxycontin for relief every day, and
depend upon the pill to sustain the quality of their
lives. They
are, quite understandably, staunch opponents of any
move that might outright ban the availability of the
drug, and yet there isn't a happy balance to be found
in a situation where 'any availability' equates to
'any available drugs might be abused'. Complicating
the matter further have been reputed allegations of
journalists, politicians and medical practitioners
receiving financial and other incentives from Purdue
Pharma.
While
it would be unfair to accuse Oxycontin solely of all
of the recorded deaths related to the drug where victims
have been engaged in polypharmacy, many lobby groups
arguing in defence of the drug may have financial
interests at stake as well. Indeed, for all the beneficial
and long'overdue public service announcements, community
awareness campaigns and community grants initiated
by Purdue Pharma in recent years, it is well'worth
recognising the significant disparity which no doubt
exists between the cost of such initiatives and the
company's overall annual profit results.
And
so the epidemic continues. Many rural and smaller
communities across America such as Maine and Virginia
that had been unfamiliar with regular occurrences
of crime have recently seen Oxycontin'attributed incidents
triple in number. In
areas like Massachusetts, efforts to curb the availability
of the drug have pushed pill prices as high as $80
and $90 each, pushing many addicts 'several teenagers
among them' to find more affordable hits in equally
dangerous and addictive $4 or $5 bags of heroin. The
answer to abating the problem no doubt lies in encouraging
further education and awareness of the risks of Oxycontin
abuse, however resolving the issue of availability
when so many ill Americans genuinely depend upon the
drug is an altogether more complicated matter whose
resolution, with extended delay, is only serving to
broaden the potential number of victims affected.
Sponsored
Links
Subscribe
to The Cud's monthly newsletter
Copyright
(c) 2005 thecud.com.au. All Rights Reserved. :: Site design by hamish
siddins