Though
Maine doesn’t have any Indian casinos there are
tribes who have secured licences for operating such activities
as bingo halls. In the larger United States, however,
especially in the case of those reservations close to
large urban centres, Indians casinos have been an incredible
success; a windfall of profit and prosperity for tribes
and communities that had previously been trapped in conditions
of sub-standard squalor, limited access to quality health
care and education, and very little opportunity for improvement.
The
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) of 1987 was the culmination
of a long period of legal wrangling but opened the door
for federally recognised tribes to conduct certain gaming
operations with the approval of the state (who of course,
receive a portion of revenue in return). There have naturally
been instances where some of the Indian casinos did not
succeed, and where tribe strife has erupted amid corruption
and inter-factionalism. Further, it cannot be denied that
casinos and gambling of any kind do, of course, invite
any number of additional social problems within the wider
community, including addiction, crime and prostitution,
however at least in respect to many of these American
Indian tribes, the casino ‘experiment’ has
been a happy one.
And
while I’d never go so far as to suggest that improved
finances from a roulette wheel and a couple of slot machines
would ever, ever make up for the degree of loss
and devastation suffered by American Indians over the
past two hundred years, it is at the very least something
that gaming licences have improved a few key aspects of
many tribe’s present and future lots in life, and
opened up opportunities for them that would not have been
there otherwise.
In
Australia, of course, we’re still sadly deficient
in the extent of support and ‘restitution’
that we’ve provided to the native Aboriginal population
for two hundred years of white men’s misdeeds. Again,
finances are by no means a total answer, and in fact Prime
Minister John Howard issuing a symbolic formal apology
to the Aboriginal people for the actions of previous governments
would perhaps hold more long-term value than many other
concessions currently on offer.
I’ve
no idea of the extent of legal and other complications
that would be involved in extending gaming rights to Aboriginal
tribes in Australia, and I am certain it would meet immense
opposition from many circles, and perhaps from within
the Aboriginal community itself. But observations of the
Indian casino model and the ongoing squalor and deprivation
that so many native Australians are forced to live in
could suggest that such an opportunity –even though
an ill in itself- might be a worthy avenue to pursue because
it is simply so much better than any other available solutions.
At the very least, if the Mabo decision and Prime
Minister John Howard haven’t yet extended to tribes
a real chance to live on quality land, in well built homes
and with the best education, medical care and benefits
possible, then maybe the misspent dollars of regular Australian
men and women can?
Yes,
it’s risky, but perhaps with a mix of advice from
American Indians (few allow their own community members
to frequent the casinos, for instance, which is solid
policy), a degree of government regulation, firm tribal
leadership, and cautious steps forward, this could be
a swift provision source of potential revenue and an improved
quality of life for many Aboriginals in Australia today.
Ezy
Reading is out every Monday.